希腊-弗里吉亚语
此條目的引用需要清理,使其符合格式。 (2021年10月6日) |
希腊-弗里吉亚语族是印欧语系假定的次级分类,包含希腊语族和弗里吉亚语。
希腊-弗里吉亚语族 | |
---|---|
Greco-Phrygian | |
地理分佈 | 巴尔干半岛南部、安纳托利亚和塞浦路斯 |
谱系学分类 | 印欧语系
|
分支 | |
– | |
Glottolog | grae1234[1] |
主流观点一般认为希腊语是弗里吉亚语关系最近的亲属,支持者有Brixhe、Neumann、Matzinger、Woodhouse、Ligorio、Lubotsky和Obrador-Cursach。此外,Obrador Cursach收集的36条共同创新证据中,弗里吉亚语和希腊语共享34个,其中22个是它们独有的。最近50年来,弗里吉亚语学界发展出了希腊-弗里吉亚语假说,认为希腊语和弗里吉亚语有共同祖先。如果弗里吉亚语的语料能再多些,这种语言应该能被构拟出来。[2]:72[3]:171[4]:1816[5]:102[6]:238-239[6]:243
证据
语言学家Claude Brixhe指出下列希腊语和弗里吉亚语共享且特有的特征:[2]
Obrador-Cursach (2019)给出了语音学、形态学和词汇学证据以支持希腊语和弗里吉亚语间的紧密关系,并附以弗里吉亚语、希腊语、亚美尼亚语、阿尔巴尼亚语和印度-伊朗语族的共同创新。[6]:234-238
弗里吉亚语特征 | 希腊 | 亚美尼亚 | 阿尔巴尼亚 | 印度-伊朗 |
---|---|---|---|---|
颚音 | + | - | - | - |
*CRh₃C > *CRōC | + | - | - | - |
/s/失落 | + | + | + | - |
词首增元音 | + | + | + | - |
*-ih₂ > -iya | + | - | + | - |
*ki̯- > s- | + | - | - | - |
*-m > -n | + | + | ? | - |
*M > T | - | + | - | - |
弗里吉亚语特征 | 希腊 | 亚美尼亚 | 阿尔巴尼亚 | 印度-伊朗 |
---|---|---|---|---|
条件的ai | + | - | - | - |
e增音 | + | + | + | + |
e-指示词 | + | - | - | - |
*-eh₂-s 阳性 | + | - | - | - |
t-扩大 | + | - | - | - |
-e-yo-中的动词 | + | - | - | - |
-o-yo-中的动词 | + | - | - | - |
*-dhn̥ | + | - | - | - |
*dhh₁s-ó- | + | - | - | - |
*-eu̯-/*-ēu̯- | + | - | - | - |
*gu̯her-mo- | + | + | + | - |
*gu̯neh₂-ik- | + | + | - | - |
*h₂eu̯-to- | + | - | + | - |
*h₃nh₃-mn- | + | + | - | - |
*méǵh₂-s | + | - | - | - |
*meh₁ | + | + | + | + |
*-mh₁no- | + | - | - | - |
ni(y)/νι | + | - | - | - |
*-(t)or | - | ? | - | - |
-toy/-τοι | + | - | - | + |
- ^ 高亮部分表示无法排除借词。
弗里吉亚语特征 | 希腊 | 亚美尼亚 | 阿尔巴尼亚 | 印度-伊朗 |
---|---|---|---|---|
*bhoh₂-t-/*bheh₂-t- | + | - | - | - |
*(h₁)en-mén- | + | - | - | - |
*ǵhl̥h₃-ró- | + | - | - | - |
kako- | + | - | - | - |
ken- | + | + | - | - |
*koru̯- | + | - | - | - |
*mōro- | + | - | - | - |
*sleh₂gu̯- | + | - | - | - |
- ^ 高亮部分表示无法排除借词。
其他假设
希腊语也曾被与亚美尼亚语和印度-伊朗语族(希腊-亚美尼亚语、希腊-雅利安语)、古马其顿语(希腊语族)、晚些时候和梅萨比语被划在一起。希腊语和古马其顿语最常组成希腊语族;其他时候古马其顿语被视作是希腊语方言,这时候希腊语族只包括希腊语方言。语言学家瓦茨拉夫·布拉热科认为,就这些语言的系属分类而言,“语料中的词汇尚不足以支持定量分析”(参见语料库语言学和定量比较语言学)。[7]:6
参考
- ^ Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin; Bank, Sebastian (编). Graeco-Phrygian. Glottolog 2.7. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. 2016.
- ^ 2.0 2.1 Brixhe, Claude. Phrygian. Woodard, Roger D (编). The Ancient Languages of Asia Minor. Cambridge University Press. 2008 [2021-10-01]. ISBN 978-0-521-68496-5. (原始内容存档于2022-03-19)."Unquestionably, however, Phrygian is most closely linked with Greek."
- ^ Woodhouse 2009:This question is of course only just separable from the question of which languages within Indo-European are most closely related to Phrygian, which has also been hotly debated. A turning point in this debate was Kortlandt's (1988) demonstration on the basis of shared sound changes that Thraco-Armenian had separated from Phrygian and other originally Balkan languages at an early stage. The consensus has now returned to regarding Greek as the closest relative.
- ^ Ligorio & Lubotsky (2018): "Phrygian is most closely related to Greek. The two languages share a few unique innovations [...] It is therefore very likely that both languages emerged from a single language, which was spoken in the Balkans at the end of the third millennium BCE.
- ^ Obrador-Cursach 2018:Furthermore, if Phrygian were not so-poorly attested perhaps we could reconstruct a Proto-Greco-Phrygian stage of both languages.
- ^ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Obrador-Cursach 2020:To the best of our current knowledge, Phrygian was closely related to Greek. This affirmation is consistent with the vision offered by Neumann (1988: 23), Brixhe (2006) and Ligorio and Lubotsky (2018: 1816) and with many observations given by ancient authors. Both languages share 34 of the 36 features considered in this paper, some of them of great significance:…The available data suggest that Phrygian and Greek coexisted broadly from pre-historic to historic times, and both belong to a common linguistic area (Brixhe 2006: 39–44). 引用错误:带有name属性“FOOTNOTEObrador-Cursach2020”的
<ref>
标签用不同内容定义了多次 - ^ Blažek, Václav. On the internal classification of Indo-European languages: survey (PDF). Linguistica Online. November 2005 [2021-10-01]. ISSN 1801-5336. (原始内容 (PDF)存档于2012-04-20).
书目
- Ligorio, Orsat; Lubotsky, Alexander. Phrygian. Jared Klein; Brian Joseph; Matthias Fritz (编). Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics. HSK 41.3. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 2018 [2021-10-01]. doi:10.1515/9783110542431-022. (原始内容存档于2021-08-16).:1816–1831
- Obrador-Cursach, Bartomeu. Lexicon of the Phrygian Inscriptions (PDF). University of Barcelona - Faculty of Philology - Department of Classical, Romance and Semitic Philology. 2018 [2021-10-01]. (原始内容 (PDF)存档于2022-04-08).
- Obrador-Cursach, Bartomeu. On the place of Phrygian among the Indo-European languages. Journal of Language Relationship. 2020, 17 (3–4) [2021-10-01]. S2CID 215769896. doi:10.31826/jlr-2019-173-407 . (原始内容存档于2020-10-18).
- Woodhouse, Robert. An overview of research on Phrygian from the nineteenth century to the present day. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis. 2009, 126 (1) [2021-10-01]. ISSN 2083-4624. (原始内容存档于2021-06-06).
阅读更多
- Blažek, Václav. Paleo-Balkanian Languages I: Hellenic Languages (PDF). Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty brněnské univerzity 10. Brno: Masarykova univerzita: 15–33. 2005 [2021-10-01]. ISBN 80-210-3784-9. (原始内容 (PDF)存档于2019-05-09).
- Brixhe, Claude. Interactions between Greek and Phrygian under the Roman Empire. Adams, J. N.; Janse, Mark (编). Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Text. Oxford University Press. 2002.:246–266
- Fortson, Benjamin W. Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction 2nd. Blackwell. 2011.:203, 252
- Masson, Olivier. Anatolian Languages. Boardman, John; Edwards, I. E. S. (编). The Cambridge Ancient History. Cambridge University Press. 1991.:668–669
- Woudhuizen, Fred C. Phrygian & Greek (PDF). Talanta, Proceedings of the Dutch Archaeological and Historical Society 40–41: 181–217. 2008–2009. (原始内容 (PDF)存档于7 April 2014).