讨论:圆明园

了解更多有关此页面的信息

新闻动态

圆明园曾于

2005年4月13日

登上维基百科首页的“新闻动态”栏位。

维基百科

本条目页依照页面评级标准评为乙级。
本条目页属于下列维基专题范畴：

历史专题

（获评乙级、未知重要度）

	历史主题查论编本条目页属于历史专题范畴，该专题旨在改善中文维基百科历史类内容。如果您有意参与，请浏览专题主页、参与讨论，并完成相应的开放性任务。
乙	根据专题质量评级标准，本条目页已评为乙级。
未知	根据专题重要度评级标准，本条目尚未接受评级。

北京专题

（获评乙级、极高重要度）

	北京主题查论编本条目页属于北京专题范畴，该专题旨在改善中文维基百科北京类内容。如果您有意参与，请浏览专题主页、参与讨论，并完成相应的开放性任务。
乙	根据专题质量评级标准，本条目页已评为乙级。
极高	根据专题重要度评级标准，本条目已评为极高重要度。

中国专题

（获评乙级、极高重要度）

	中国主题查论编本条目页属于中国专题范畴，该专题旨在改善中文维基百科中国领域类内容。如果您有意参与，请浏览专题主页、参与讨论，并完成相应的开放性任务。
乙	根据专题质量评级标准，本条目页已评为乙级。
极高	根据专题重要度评级标准，本条目已评为极高重要度。

中国文化遗产专题

（获评乙级、极高重要度）

	中国文化遗产主题查论编本条目页属于中国文化遗产专题范畴，该专题旨在改善中文维基百科中国文化遗产类内容。如果您有意参与，请浏览专题主页、参与讨论，并完成相应的开放性任务。
乙	根据专题质量评级标准，本条目页已评为乙级。
极高	根据专题重要度评级标准，本条目已评为极高重要度。

条目质量提升计划专题

（获评乙级）

圆明园条目质量已经提升，根据条目质量标准参考的评分，结果如下：

平均得分：

3.5

条目质量：

良

乙

根据质量评级标准，本条目页已评为乙级。

圆明园曾属优良条目，但已撤销资格。下方条目里程碑的链接中可了解撤销资格的详细原因及改善建议。条目照建议改善而重新符合标准后可再次提名评选。

条目里程碑
日期	事项	结果
2006年10月28日	优良条目评选	落选
2006年12月14日	优良条目评选	入选
2012年8月2日	优良条目重审	撤销

当前状态：已撤销的优良条目

This article was edited as part of the Peabody Essex Museum Edit-a-thon Spring 2014

The editor who attended the event may be a new editor. In an effort to support new editors, please assume good faith to their contributions before making changes. Thank you! Ed Rodley (talk)

中立性有争议

最新留言：在5年前发布1条留言1人参与讨论

“中国竟敢逮捕英人抵抗英国入侵”为由...... 英国人会说自己是侵略者吗? 缺乏客观内容希望有补充英法军与满清两方面的说法--Picnic11219（留言） 2019年4月30日 (二) 10:00 (UTC)回复

英语

不知维基的英文版有没有圆明园的介绍 - kalum

对内容进行了补充. 圆明园四十景的介绍参考清大学士于敏中所写的圆明园册和其他清人文章, 西洋楼景区介绍及内部陈设资料来自金勋回忆, 金勋为满洲旗人, 生于1882年, 12岁前在绮春园正觉寺当喇嘛, 后又至大堂档房当差, 目睹园中未损景区, 并从总管太监口中得知当年情况.Salus Populi Supremo Lex Esto 15:13 2005年9月19日 (UTC)

User:Ksmao编辑之后图片排列乱了, 我恢复到了上一次操作. -- Magnae Virtutis ex Vicipaedia 16:41 2005年10月4日 (UTC)

此条目过长，是否考虑将“圆明园四十景”单列出来成为一个独立的条目？—Emcc 05:03 2007年4月8日 (UTC)

优良条目评选

以下内容由Wikipedia:优良条目候选移至

圆明园（编辑 | 讨论 | 历史 | 链接 | 监视 | 日志）分类：历史-古迹--沙田友 17:47 2006年10月21日 (UTC)
- (＋)支持--人神之间 18:32 2006年10月21日 (UTC)
- (－)反对，内容不错，但可惜的是缺少参考资料。--长夜无风(风言风语) 04:55 2006年10月22日 (UTC)
- (＋)支持, 支持中文原创内容。 - Munford 23:57 2006年10月26日 (UTC)
- (－)反对，内文本身是不错，可是整体看上去还是很杂，可能还需要大幅修饰。嘉禾 17:21 2006年10月27日 (UTC)

第二次优良条目评选

以下内容由Wikipedia:优良条目候选移至

圆明园（编辑 | 讨论 | 历史 | 链接 | 监视 | 日志）分类：公园--不中举的秀才(江南贡院) 06:48 2006年12月7日 (UTC)
- (＋)支持，内容实际、详细，图片丰富 --dbslikacheung 08:00 2006年12月7日 (UTC)
- ~~(－)反对~~，没有列明参考资料。--长夜无风(风言风语) 10:07 2006年12月7日 (UTC)
  - 改为(＋)支持--长夜无风(风言风语) 07:51 2006年12月9日 (UTC)
- (＋)支持，已列明参考资料--沙田友 10:33 2006年12月7日 (UTC)
- (－)反对，部分章节过于单薄--百無一用是書生 (☎) 12:44 2006年12月7日 (UTC)
- (＋)支持--蜜蜂 (Talk) 17:41 2006年12月7日 (UTC)
- (＋)支持--洛卡其 08:38 2006年12月8日 (UTC)
- (＋)支持--Iflwlou 12:27 2006年12月8日 (UTC)

圆明园（3-0）

最新留言：在17年前发布2条留言1人参与讨论

from Wikipedia:条目质量提升计划/票选主题

支持

反对

圆明园在建筑类型、文化内涵、历史意义等各方面都有很多可写之处，应该可以扩充成一个很好的条目，现有的内容太少。--蓝色理想补充每日所需维生素 16:30 2005年4月8日 (UTC)
可怜的圆明园，再次被人破坏了--这个人很懒，什么也没留下 :D 10:36 2005年4月16日 (UTC)
这个条目提升一定要确定是以先在的遗址为基点，还是以盛世的建筑为基点，否则很难架构好条目。--用心阁（对话页） 15:01 2006年3月17日 (UTC)
我认为可以分段记载，全篇以盛世建筑为主体，中后段再描述外交和战争的影响，以及目前维护状况，这样就没什么问题了，只是琣次看到这段历史就好伤心呢，虽然是民脂民膏，但是这么美丽的建筑就这样摧毁，实在令人心疼，重建它的风貌也有助于我们对该段历史的回顾和分析--Droxiang 14:38 2007年1月17日 (UTC)
(＋)赞成，可以顺便把2006年一部纪录片《圆明园》也写一写。—Woc2006 2007年4月30日 (一) 13:25 (UTC)回复

优良条目重审

最新留言：在12年前发布8条留言6人参与讨论

圆明园（编辑 | 讨论 | 历史 | 链接 | 监视 | 日志），提名人：达师－ 218 － 372 2012年7月26日 (四) 14:28 (UTC)回复

投票期：2012年7月26日 (四) 14:28 (UTC) 至 2012年8月2日 (四) 14:28 (UTC)

(＋)支持：提名人票。缺乏脚注。有来源请求。--达师－ 218 － 372 2012年7月26日 (四) 14:28 (UTC)回复
(＋)支持：同上。文句组织的不好，许多点列-综合征与一万年（留言） 2012年7月28日 (六) 04:21 (UTC)回复
(＋)支持：这么长一篇的条目，脚注实在过少。园林特色一节的内容过于琐碎。-- Marcus Hsu talk 2012年8月1日 (三) 03:03 (UTC)回复
(＋)支持缺乏脚注--百無一用是書生 (☎) 2012年8月2日 (四) 02:38 (UTC)回复
(＋)支持，来源请求。--CHEM.is.TRY 2012年8月2日 (四) 04:00 (UTC)回复
(＋)支持，来源不能支持全文。--铁铁的火大了（留言） 2012年8月2日 (四) 06:20 (UTC)回复

除名：6支持，0反对。--铁铁的火大了（留言） 2012年8月2日 (四) 14:37 (UTC)回复

圆明园的焚毁与残败

Out of convenience since Mandarin is a second language to me, please let me express myself in English.

I believe this section of the article is incomplete and presented in an unfair manner. Wikipedia is a place to list fact and knowledge, not to practice soft power and propaganda. As of today, this article shows the timeline and "details" as they are taught in Mainland China under CCP's influence. It would be of scientific interest to show all sides of the story and not omit parts which are crucial to the understanding of the dramatic events mentioned.

Allow me to take the following extract from the English version of the same article:

In 1860, during the Second Opium War, British and French expeditionary forces, having marched inland from the coast at Tianjin (Tientsin), arrived in Beijing (Peking).

In mid-September, two envoys, Henry Loch and Harry Parkes went ahead of the main force under a flag of truce to negotiate with Prince Yi and representatives of the Qing Empire at Tongzhou (Tungchow). After a day of talks, they and their small escort of British and Indian troopers (including two British envoys and Thomas William Bowlby, a journalist for The Times) were taken prisoner by the Qing general Sengge Rinchen. They were taken to the Ministry of Justice (or Board of Punishments) in Beijing, where they were confined and tortured. Parkes and Loch were returned after two weeks, with 14 other survivors. 20 British, French and Indian captives died. Their bodies were barely recognizable.[3] On the night of 5 October, French units diverted from the main attack force towards the Old Summer Palace. At the time, the palace was occupied by only some eunuchs and palace maids; the Xianfeng Emperor and his entourage had already fled to the Chengde Mountain Resort in Hebei. Although the French commander Charles Cousin-Montauban assured his British counterpart, James Hope Grant, that "nothing had been touched", there was extensive looting by French and British soldiers.[11] There was no significant resistance to the looting, even though many Qing soldiers were in the vicinity.[11]

On October 18, Lord Elgin, the British High Commissioner to China, retaliated against the torture and executions by ordering the destruction of the Old Summer Palace.[12] Destroying the Old Summer Palace was also thought to be a way of discouraging the Qing Empire from using kidnapping as a bargaining tool.[13] It took 3,500 British troops to set the entire place ablaze, and the massive fire lasted for three days. Unknown to the troops, some 300 remaining eunuchs and palace maids, who concealed themselves from the intruders in locked rooms, perished with the burnt palace buildings. Only 13 buildings survived intact, most of them in the remote areas or by the lakeside. (The palace would be sacked once again and completely destroyed in 1900 when the forces of the Eight-Nation Alliance invaded Beijing.[14]) Charles George Gordon, who was then a 27-year-old captain in the Royal Engineers and part of the 1860 Anglo-French expeditionary force, wrote about his experience:

We went out, and, after pillaging it, burned the whole place, destroying in a vandal-like manner most valuable property which [could] not be replaced for four millions. We got upward of £48 apiece prize money...I have done well. The [local] people are very civil, but I think the grandees hate us, as they must after what we did the Palace. You can scarcely imagine the beauty and magnificence of the places we burnt. It made one's heart sore to burn them; in fact, these places were so large, and we were so pressed for time, that we could not plunder them carefully. Quantities of gold ornaments were burnt, considered as brass. It was wretchedly demoralizing work for an army.

British and French looters preferred porcelain (much of which still graces British and French country houses[15]) while neglecting bronze vessels prized locally for cooking and burial in tombs. Many such treasures dated back to the Shang, Zhou and Han dynasties and were up to 3,600 years old. A specific exception was the looting of the Haiyantang Zodiac fountain with its twelve bronze animal heads.[16] Some of the most notable treasures ended up at the Chinese Museum in the Palace of Fontainebleau, which Empress Eugénie specifically set up in 1867 to house these newly acquired collections.

Once the Old Summer Palace had been reduced to ruins, a sign was raised with an inscription in Chinese stating, "This is the reward for perfidy and cruelty". The burning of the palace was the last act of the war.[17]

According to Professor Wang Daocheng of the Renmin University of China, not all of the palace was destroyed in the original burning.[18] Instead, some historical records indicate that 16 of the garden scenes survived the destruction in 1860.[18] Wang identifies the Republican era and the Cultural Revolution as two significant periods that contributed further to the destruction of the Old Summer Palace.[18] Photographic evidence and eye witness accounts make it clear that (although the palace complex was initially protected by the Qing emperors)it was during the Boxer Rebellion and in the immediate aftermath of the fall of the dynasty when most of the surviving structures were destroyed. Further, the Imperial household itself sold off the magnificent trees in the garden for revenue during the 1890s and after 1900 the palace was used as a veritable builder's yard for anyone who wanted construction materials. Entire buildings were built of materials taken from the Yuanming Yuan and smart Peking houses were adorned with sculptures and architectural elements plundered from the site.

Like the Forbidden City, no commoner had ever been allowed into the Old Summer Palace, as it was used exclusively by the imperial family of the Qing Empire.[19] The burning of the Old Summer Palace is still a very sensitive issue in China today.[15] The destruction of the palace has been perceived as barbaric and criminal by many Chinese, as well as by external observers. In his "Expédition de Chine", Victor Hugo described the looting as, "Two robbers breaking into a museum. One has looted, the other has burnt. (...) one of the two conquerors filled its pockets, seing that, the other filled its safes; and they came back to Europe laughing hand-in-hand. (...) Before history, one of the bandits will be called France and the other England."[20][21] In his letter, Hugo hoped that one day France would feel guilty and return what it had plundered from China.[22]

Mauricio Percara, journalist and Argentine writer who works at China Radio International, talks about the apology through the literature by Victor Hugo and mentioned in his story entitled redemption the bust of the French writer located in the old Summer Palace: "at the site where their French peers ever posed his destructive feet today a radiant bust of the great Victor Hugo rises. From the old Summer Palace, the gardens of perfect brightness, a righteous French poses her look of stone in the snow falling obediently on the worn floor of the capital of the North."[23]