维基百科:傀儡调查/案件/Rastinition/存档

Rastinition

2022年4月10日

疑似傀儡

  请求进行用户查核:于下列条目发动跟踪回退战:

第二次冷战diff1diff2diff3

沙琪玛diff1diff2diff3

乔·拜登diff1diff2diff3

中国东方航空5735号班机空难diff1diff2diff3diff4diff5diff6

台湾海峡两岸情况对比diff1diff2diff3diff4diff5

甚至还反到WP:当前的破坏提报本人:本人在讨论页不回应是因为显然对破坏者只要回退不理会即可,更何况是这种专门针对本人合理编辑的跟踪式无理由回退。--零醇留言2022年4月10日 (日) 07:05 (UTC)[回复]

其他用户的意见

被指控使用傀儡的用户也可在此段留言或进行讨论。

@SD hehua如果有充足证据,可以请求查证是否有“滥用IP傀儡”的情况,但不会直接关联于个别IP。我稍后再看看。--西 2022年4月10日 (日) 07:52 (UTC)[回复]
谢谢您。--在下荷花请多指教欢迎签到2022年4月10日 (日) 09:27 (UTC)[回复]
额,我咋了?有人能细说一下吗。--东风留言2022年4月26日 (二) 04:11 (UTC)[回复]
Shinohara Chihiro用的是简体,但是IP是繁体,是代理?Ghren🐦🕚 2022年4月27日 (三) 03:37 (UTC)[回复]
  1. Neither of the users appear to be editing logged out.(下面不是翻译,是个人解读)
    检查的账号没有出现(appear)退出编辑(editing logged out),与IP活动时间不一致。
  2. Shinohara Chihiro is editing logged out though so I would recommend action against them.(下面不是翻译,是个人解读)
    Shinohara Chihiro有退出编辑(editing logged out)(与IP活动时间一致),建议锁定。(参考账号创建时间及账号编辑能力,锁定效果可能不好。可能可以参考File:New MediaWiki protection shackle.svg,也可能和2409:8a44:7234:f050:f8a8:c265:8836:3053 、2409:8a44:7236:5d10:e429:7035:19a9:f68a 、39.149.32.43及39.149.32.199的IP range有关。也可能不是同一人行动,而是群组行动)--Rastinition留言2022年4月27日 (三) 09:53 (UTC)[回复]
    @Shizhao@Mys_721tx。--🎋🎍 2022年4月28日 (四) 16:17 (UTC)[回复]

调查助理、监管员、巡检管理员的意见

这两个用户似乎都没有在编辑时注销账户。不过,Shinohara Chihiro编辑时注销了账户,所以我建议对他们采取行动。
Neither of the users appear to be editing logged out. Shinohara Chihiro is editing logged out though so I would recommend action against them.

--东风留言2022年4月26日 (二) 04:19 (UTC)[回复]
题外话,这个“他们”指的是Shinohara Chihiro和他用过的IP吗?--东风留言2022年4月26日 (二) 04:20 (UTC)[回复]
这个them指的是Shinohara Chihiro(这里按中文翻译成“TA”更合适)。Itcfangye留言2022年4月26日 (二) 05:05 (UTC)[回复]
我在问监管员回复关于S是否与两名用户有任何关联。--西 2022年4月26日 (二) 07:23 (UTC)[回复]
AmandaNP::No they are not.--东风留言2022年4月26日 (二) 14:33 (UTC)[回复]

2023年8月21日

疑似傀儡

  请求进行用户查核:NmWTfs85lXusaybq admitted EpJjgOa8rVvvsRmZL is his account.

EpJjgOa8rVvvsRmZL and Rastinition behave very similar with them both pretending to start out by mass fixing templates with some script and mass automated removal of content farms and fixing links and then start editing the same political topics about Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong and PRC CCP politics. I believe they are single purpose account pretending they are just fixing content farms as a cover for their political edit warring.

Both EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZL and Rastinition use scripts to mass remove kknews.cc content farm. They started their "fixing" of temples and removing content farms right after signing up as new accounts and new accounts shouldn't know how to do this so fast. NmWTfs85lXusaybq is suddenly familiar with all Wikipedia rules after signing up. Also, Rastinition removing kknews.cc while EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZL removing kknew.cc.

Rastinition

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PL-12&diff=prev&oldid=1062345056 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=T-34_variants&diff=prev&oldid=1054956976 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aerial_engagements_of_the_Second_Sino-Japanese_War&diff=prev&oldid=1055041072 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jin_Ying&diff=prev&oldid=1054956666 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kunming_Changshui_International_Airport&diff=prev&oldid=1054956582 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donegi_Abena&diff=prev&oldid=1054955633 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wang_Wenfeng&diff=prev&oldid=1054412851 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sun_Yat-sen&diff=prev&oldid=1166261346


EpJjgOa8rVvvsRmZL:

https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E9%98%BF%E5%AF%AC&diff=prev&oldid=77138842 https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E7%B4%85%E9%B8%9E&diff=prev&oldid=77138839 https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E7%A5%AD%E5%A4%A9&diff=prev&oldid=77138837 https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E6%BA%AB%E6%9F%94%E7%9A%84%E5%AD%90%E5%BD%88&diff=prev&oldid=77138835 https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E6%9D%8E%E5%AE%97%E5%90%BE&diff=prev&oldid=77138833

Rastinition and EpJjgOa8rVvvsRmZL and NmWTfs85lXusaybq all know Chinese and Japanese and they edit pro-Japanese POV into war crimes articles, blaming non-Japanese for Japanese war crimes or deleting them.

Rastinition can read Japanese

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zhengding_Missionary_Murder&diff=prev&oldid=1090674159

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_war_crimes&diff=prev&oldid=1148782665

NmWTfs85lXusaybq can read Japanese and he edits pro-Japanese POV into articles

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_China_(Second_Sino-Japanese_War)&diff=prev&oldid=1149202156

What kind of new editor, EpJjgOa8rVvvsRmZL knows how to mass fix templates and know all the wikipedia rules right after signing up? New editors don't start like this only sockpuppets do.

https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B7%E8%B4%A1%E7%8C%AE/EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZL&target=EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZL&dir=prev&limit=500

Rastinition has same kind of edit after being a new account all a sudden he knows wikipedia rules on what doesn't belong and uses scripts for fixing links and mass removing content farms and soon after he edits political topics about China.

https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B7%E8%B4%A1%E7%8C%AE/Rastinition&target=Rastinition&dir=prev

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Rastinition&target=Rastinition&dir=prev

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Rastinition&target=Rastinition&dir=prev&offset=20210920130058&limit=100

Rastinition and NmWTfs85lXusaybq both edit Japanese war crimes. Rastinition edited it before me and if NmWTfs85lXusaybq is him then he spott me there first but pretended he didn't see me and edit war with me in another article to create a fake encounter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_war_crimes&action=history&offset=&limit=500

The kind of edits in these accounts mean that there must be sleeper accounts hiding.

Btw, EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZL mostly edit in the Chinese Wiki while Rastinition is both in Chinese and English Wikipedia.

If both accounts aren't the same person, the fact that they knew scripts and rules so fast would mark them as suspicious account and I like to request scan for any sleeper accounts in English, Chinese and Japanese Wikipedia.

The users in question edit the same topics and likely uses different accounts to avoid scrutiny. These editors are in violation of the sockpuppet policy to evade scrutiny while editing the same topics like Japan in WW2. Rastinition edits are like NwM which are both pro Japanese, including where is just remove a few links, which is also violating the scrutiny policy. They are trying tilt the POV in favour of the Japanese. Regardless of their POV, they are not allowed to evade scrutiny on editing the same topic with multiple accounts, especially when the sockpuppet had a history of bias on the topic. You are only allowed to do if you edit completely different topics. It is not like one account edit antiquity war and another edit a modern war, it is editing pages tied to the same war.

These are the evidence here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Taierzhuang&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_China_(Second_Sino-Japanese_War)&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Ichi-Go&diff=prev&oldid=1162945990 Japanese war crimes against Catholic priest https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-Catholicism&diff=prev&oldid=1168770563 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zhengding_Missionary_Murder&diff=prev&oldid=1090674159 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_war_crimes&action=history&offset=&limit=500 By Rastinition: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Changsha_(1941)&diff=prev&oldid=1089098002 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Mount_Song&diff=prev&oldid=1095689723 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Changsha_(1939)&diff=prev&oldid=1089099872 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Changsha_(1941%E2%80%931942)&diff=prev&oldid=1089103667 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aerial_engagements_of_the_Second_Sino-Japanese_War&diff=prev&oldid=1055041072 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bombing_of_Chongqing&diff=prev&oldid=1055042911 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_South_Guangxi&diff=prev&oldid=1055042526 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Taierzhuang&diff=prev&oldid=1076945386 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Taierzhuang&diff=prev&oldid=1088658235 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Sino-Japanese_War&diff=prev&oldid=1046290456 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Sino-Japanese_War&diff=prev&oldid=1147821627 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_war_crimes&diff=prev&oldid=1149216173--Yaujj13留言2023年8月21日 (一) 17:41 (UTC)[回复]

其他用户的意见

被指控使用傀儡的用户也可在此段留言或进行讨论。

en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rastinition/Archive--Rastinition留言2023年8月21日 (一) 18:38 (UTC)[回复]

@Yaujj13 and @Rastinition To sysops, SPI clerks and Checkusers on this project, original checkuser request was declined on English Wikipedia and this is impossible to become helpful here. Lemonaka留言2023年8月22日 (二) 02:08 (UTC)[回复]

调查助理、监管员、巡检管理员的意见

问题 账号
上笔可见编辑已为90天前,可能  数据过期 EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZLNmWTfs85lXusaybq