維基百科:傀儡調查/案件/Rastinition/存檔

Rastinition

2022年4月10日

疑似傀儡

  請求進行使用者查核:於下列條目發動跟蹤回退戰:

第二次冷戰diff1diff2diff3

沙琪瑪diff1diff2diff3

喬·拜登diff1diff2diff3

中國東方航空5735號班機空難diff1diff2diff3diff4diff5diff6

台灣海峽兩岸情況對比diff1diff2diff3diff4diff5

甚至還反到WP:當前的破壞提報本人:本人在討論頁不回應是因為顯然對破壞者只要回退不理會即可,更何況是這種專門針對本人合理編輯的跟蹤式無理由回退。--零醇留言2022年4月10日 (日) 07:05 (UTC)[回覆]

其他使用者的意見

被指控使用傀儡的使用者也可在此段留言或進行討論。

@SD hehua如果有充足證據,可以請求查證是否有「濫用IP傀儡」的情況,但不會直接關聯於個別IP。我稍後再看看。--西 2022年4月10日 (日) 07:52 (UTC)[回覆]
謝謝您。--在下荷花請多指教歡迎簽到2022年4月10日 (日) 09:27 (UTC)[回覆]
額,我咋了?有人能細說一下嗎。--東風留言2022年4月26日 (二) 04:11 (UTC)[回覆]
Shinohara Chihiro用的是簡體,但是IP是繁體,是代理?Ghren🐦🕚 2022年4月27日 (三) 03:37 (UTC)[回覆]
  1. Neither of the users appear to be editing logged out.(下面不是翻譯,是個人解讀)
    檢查的帳號沒有出現(appear)登出編輯(editing logged out),與IP活動時間不一致。
  2. Shinohara Chihiro is editing logged out though so I would recommend action against them.(下面不是翻譯,是個人解讀)
    Shinohara Chihiro有登出編輯(editing logged out)(與IP活動時間一致),建議鎖定。(參考帳號建立時間及帳號編輯能力,鎖定效果可能不好。可能可以參考File:New MediaWiki protection shackle.svg,也可能和2409:8a44:7234:f050:f8a8:c265:8836:3053 、2409:8a44:7236:5d10:e429:7035:19a9:f68a 、39.149.32.43及39.149.32.199的IP range有關。也可能不是同一人行動,而是群組行動)--Rastinition留言2022年4月27日 (三) 09:53 (UTC)[回覆]
    @Shizhao@Mys_721tx。--🎋🎍 2022年4月28日 (四) 16:17 (UTC)[回覆]

調查助理、監管員、巡檢管理員的意見

這兩個使用者似乎都沒有在編輯時註銷帳號。不過,Shinohara Chihiro編輯時註銷了帳號,所以我建議對他們採取行動。
Neither of the users appear to be editing logged out. Shinohara Chihiro is editing logged out though so I would recommend action against them.

--東風留言2022年4月26日 (二) 04:19 (UTC)[回覆]
題外話,這個「他們」指的是Shinohara Chihiro和他用過的IP嗎?--東風留言2022年4月26日 (二) 04:20 (UTC)[回覆]
這個them指的是Shinohara Chihiro(這裡按中文翻譯成「TA」更合適)。Itcfangye留言2022年4月26日 (二) 05:05 (UTC)[回覆]
我在問監管員回覆關於S是否與兩名使用者有任何關聯。--西 2022年4月26日 (二) 07:23 (UTC)[回覆]
AmandaNP::No they are not.--東風留言2022年4月26日 (二) 14:33 (UTC)[回覆]

2023年8月21日

疑似傀儡

  請求進行使用者查核:NmWTfs85lXusaybq admitted EpJjgOa8rVvvsRmZL is his account.

EpJjgOa8rVvvsRmZL and Rastinition behave very similar with them both pretending to start out by mass fixing templates with some script and mass automated removal of content farms and fixing links and then start editing the same political topics about Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong and PRC CCP politics. I believe they are single purpose account pretending they are just fixing content farms as a cover for their political edit warring.

Both EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZL and Rastinition use scripts to mass remove kknews.cc content farm. They started their "fixing" of temples and removing content farms right after signing up as new accounts and new accounts shouldn't know how to do this so fast. NmWTfs85lXusaybq is suddenly familiar with all Wikipedia rules after signing up. Also, Rastinition removing kknews.cc while EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZL removing kknew.cc.

Rastinition

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PL-12&diff=prev&oldid=1062345056 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=T-34_variants&diff=prev&oldid=1054956976 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aerial_engagements_of_the_Second_Sino-Japanese_War&diff=prev&oldid=1055041072 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jin_Ying&diff=prev&oldid=1054956666 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kunming_Changshui_International_Airport&diff=prev&oldid=1054956582 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donegi_Abena&diff=prev&oldid=1054955633 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wang_Wenfeng&diff=prev&oldid=1054412851 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sun_Yat-sen&diff=prev&oldid=1166261346


EpJjgOa8rVvvsRmZL:

https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E9%98%BF%E5%AF%AC&diff=prev&oldid=77138842 https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E7%B4%85%E9%B8%9E&diff=prev&oldid=77138839 https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E7%A5%AD%E5%A4%A9&diff=prev&oldid=77138837 https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E6%BA%AB%E6%9F%94%E7%9A%84%E5%AD%90%E5%BD%88&diff=prev&oldid=77138835 https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E6%9D%8E%E5%AE%97%E5%90%BE&diff=prev&oldid=77138833

Rastinition and EpJjgOa8rVvvsRmZL and NmWTfs85lXusaybq all know Chinese and Japanese and they edit pro-Japanese POV into war crimes articles, blaming non-Japanese for Japanese war crimes or deleting them.

Rastinition can read Japanese

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zhengding_Missionary_Murder&diff=prev&oldid=1090674159

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_war_crimes&diff=prev&oldid=1148782665

NmWTfs85lXusaybq can read Japanese and he edits pro-Japanese POV into articles

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_China_(Second_Sino-Japanese_War)&diff=prev&oldid=1149202156

What kind of new editor, EpJjgOa8rVvvsRmZL knows how to mass fix templates and know all the wikipedia rules right after signing up? New editors don't start like this only sockpuppets do.

https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B7%E8%B4%A1%E7%8C%AE/EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZL&target=EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZL&dir=prev&limit=500

Rastinition has same kind of edit after being a new account all a sudden he knows wikipedia rules on what doesn't belong and uses scripts for fixing links and mass removing content farms and soon after he edits political topics about China.

https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B7%E8%B4%A1%E7%8C%AE/Rastinition&target=Rastinition&dir=prev

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Rastinition&target=Rastinition&dir=prev

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Rastinition&target=Rastinition&dir=prev&offset=20210920130058&limit=100

Rastinition and NmWTfs85lXusaybq both edit Japanese war crimes. Rastinition edited it before me and if NmWTfs85lXusaybq is him then he spott me there first but pretended he didn't see me and edit war with me in another article to create a fake encounter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_war_crimes&action=history&offset=&limit=500

The kind of edits in these accounts mean that there must be sleeper accounts hiding.

Btw, EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZL mostly edit in the Chinese Wiki while Rastinition is both in Chinese and English Wikipedia.

If both accounts aren't the same person, the fact that they knew scripts and rules so fast would mark them as suspicious account and I like to request scan for any sleeper accounts in English, Chinese and Japanese Wikipedia.

The users in question edit the same topics and likely uses different accounts to avoid scrutiny. These editors are in violation of the sockpuppet policy to evade scrutiny while editing the same topics like Japan in WW2. Rastinition edits are like NwM which are both pro Japanese, including where is just remove a few links, which is also violating the scrutiny policy. They are trying tilt the POV in favour of the Japanese. Regardless of their POV, they are not allowed to evade scrutiny on editing the same topic with multiple accounts, especially when the sockpuppet had a history of bias on the topic. You are only allowed to do if you edit completely different topics. It is not like one account edit antiquity war and another edit a modern war, it is editing pages tied to the same war.

These are the evidence here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Taierzhuang&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_China_(Second_Sino-Japanese_War)&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Ichi-Go&diff=prev&oldid=1162945990 Japanese war crimes against Catholic priest https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-Catholicism&diff=prev&oldid=1168770563 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zhengding_Missionary_Murder&diff=prev&oldid=1090674159 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_war_crimes&action=history&offset=&limit=500 By Rastinition: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Changsha_(1941)&diff=prev&oldid=1089098002 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Mount_Song&diff=prev&oldid=1095689723 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Changsha_(1939)&diff=prev&oldid=1089099872 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Changsha_(1941%E2%80%931942)&diff=prev&oldid=1089103667 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aerial_engagements_of_the_Second_Sino-Japanese_War&diff=prev&oldid=1055041072 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bombing_of_Chongqing&diff=prev&oldid=1055042911 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_South_Guangxi&diff=prev&oldid=1055042526 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Taierzhuang&diff=prev&oldid=1076945386 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Taierzhuang&diff=prev&oldid=1088658235 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Sino-Japanese_War&diff=prev&oldid=1046290456 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Sino-Japanese_War&diff=prev&oldid=1147821627 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_war_crimes&diff=prev&oldid=1149216173--Yaujj13留言2023年8月21日 (一) 17:41 (UTC)[回覆]

其他使用者的意見

被指控使用傀儡的使用者也可在此段留言或進行討論。

en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rastinition/Archive--Rastinition留言2023年8月21日 (一) 18:38 (UTC)[回覆]

@Yaujj13 and @Rastinition To sysops, SPI clerks and Checkusers on this project, original checkuser request was declined on English Wikipedia and this is impossible to become helpful here. Lemonaka留言2023年8月22日 (二) 02:08 (UTC)[回覆]

調查助理、監管員、巡檢管理員的意見

問題 帳號
上筆可見編輯已為90天前,可能  數據過期 EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZLNmWTfs85lXusaybq